BLACK LIVES MATTER

Why Pro-Life Justices Refused to Save An Innocent Black Man’s Life

Execution of Marcellus “Khalifah” Williams exposes their inconsistency

Allison Wiltz M.S.
Momentum
Published in
6 min readSep 25, 2024

--

Marcellus Williams, photographed in prison via the Missouri Independent | Background removed using CANVA

The matter came up for judicial investigation, but as might have been expected, the white people concluded it was unnecessary to wait for the result of the investigation — that it was preferable to hang the accused first and try him afterward,” Ida B. Wells wrote in The Red Record in 1895. However, similar words could have easily been uttered after the Missouri execution of Marcellus “Khalifah” Williams, a 55-year-old Black father and poet, Tuesday evening. Despite compelling evidence supporting his innocence in the 1998 murder of Felicia Gayle, neither Governor Mike Parson, the Missouri Supreme Court, nor the U.S. Supreme Court intervened to save his life. This decision has left many in the black community grief-stricken and outraged at the injustice. “Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” the NAACP responded, clarifying that “when DNA evidence proves innocence, capital punishment is not justice — it is murder.” To add salt to the wound, so-called pro-life Supreme Court justices are the ones who refused to grant Williams a stay of execution.

Pro-life justices failed to intervene to save the life of a Black man who even…

--

--

Allison Wiltz M.S.
Momentum

Black womanist scholar and doctoral candidate from New Orleans, LA with bylines @ Momentum, Oprah Daily, ZORA, Cultured #WEOC Founder. allisonthedailywriter.com